Home

About Us

Advertisement

Contact Us

  • Facebook
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • RSS Feed
  • TikTok

Interesting For You 24

Your Trusted Voice Across the World.

    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
Search

Supreme Court keeps hold on Trump’s restrictions on birthright citizenship but sets May arguments

April 17, 2025
Supreme Court keeps hold on Trump’s restrictions on birthright citizenship but sets May arguments

WASHINGTON  — The Supreme Court on Thursday kept on hold President Donald Trump’s restrictions on birthright citizenship but agreed to hear arguments on the issue in May.

Trump’s executive order to end birthright citizenship for the children of people who are in the U.S. illegally has been halted nationwide by three district courts around the country. Appeals courts have declined to disturb those rulings.

The Republican administration had sought to narrow those orders to allow for the policy to take effect in parts or most of the country while court challenges play out. That is expected to be the focus of the high court arguments.

Birthright citizenship automatically makes anyone born in the United States an American citizen, including children born to mothers in the country illegally. The right was enshrined soon after the Civil War in the Constitution’s 14th Amendment.

Related Articles


Dozens more UC San Diego student visas canceled


Feldman: Supreme Court’s strategy for dealing with the White House emerges


Bill would make California schools ‘safe havens’ from immigration enforcement


2 Camp Pendleton Marines killed in vehicle accident while patrolling southern border


Maryland Sen. Van Hollen says he was denied entry to the El Salvador prison holding Abrego Garcia

Trump and his supporters have argued that there should be tougher standards for becoming an American citizen, which he called “a priceless and profound gift” in the executive order he signed soon after becoming president again in January.

The Trump administration has asserted that children of noncitizens are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States, a phrase used in the amendment, and therefore are not entitled to citizenship.

States, immigrants and rights groups that have sued to block the executive order have accused the administration of trying to unsettle the understanding of birthright citizenship that has been accepted since the amendment’s adoption.

Judges so far have uniformly ruled against the administration.

Featured Articles

  • Foreclosures, defaults jolt hotel deals in Bay Area, California

    Foreclosures, defaults jolt hotel deals in Bay Area, California

    July 30, 2025
  • Review: Giving the new Tesla Diner in Los Angeles a test drive

    Review: Giving the new Tesla Diner in Los Angeles a test drive

    July 30, 2025
  • Samsung’s Tesla order fuels recovery bets despite chip woes

    Samsung’s Tesla order fuels recovery bets despite chip woes

    July 30, 2025
  • Meta, Microsoft face investor scrutiny over AI spending binge

    Meta, Microsoft face investor scrutiny over AI spending binge

    July 30, 2025
  • Reimagined ‘Richard III’ plays up ruler’s skulduggery

    Reimagined ‘Richard III’ plays up ruler’s skulduggery

    July 30, 2025

Search

Latest Articles

  • Foreclosures, defaults jolt hotel deals in Bay Area, California

    Foreclosures, defaults jolt hotel deals in Bay Area, California

    July 30, 2025
  • Review: Giving the new Tesla Diner in Los Angeles a test drive

    Review: Giving the new Tesla Diner in Los Angeles a test drive

    July 30, 2025
  • Samsung’s Tesla order fuels recovery bets despite chip woes

    Samsung’s Tesla order fuels recovery bets despite chip woes

    July 30, 2025

181 Peachtree St NE, Atlanta, GA 30303 | +14046590400 | [email protected]

Scroll to Top