SAN JOSE — A petition to an appeals court by the union representing Valley Transportation Authority Workers, requesting a reversal of a superior court decision ordering them back to work was denied Friday, according to court documents.
The Amalgamated Transit Union Local 265, which went on an historic two-and-a-half week strike in March after negotiations for a new contract broke down, had filed a petition with the Sixth District Court of Appeal on April 1, challenging the ruling of the Santa Clara County Superior Court.
That petition was summarily denied Friday, according to court records.
A representative of the union could not be immediately reached for comment.
Related Articles
Contract talks between Fremont teachers, district fail as possible strike looms
‘The strike was our last resort’: VTA union has lost its leverage to push for new contract, president says
VTA union files appeal of judge’s decision mandating end of strike
Fremont teacher union threatens possible strike
Some VTA light rail service resumes Monday
The union walked off the job March 10, and the VTA had filed the court case against the union on the first day of its strike alleging that the union violated a “no strike” clause in the contract. The union maintained that the clause no longer applied because the contract had expired.
In late March, Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Daniel T. Nishigaya ruled that the union had to return to work immediately. He issued an injunction on the grounds that the VTA met its initial burden to show probable success but did not issue a ruling on the claims in the case.
The Court of Appeal had given the Superior Court and the VTA a deadline of Friday to file objections to the suit.
